Showing posts with label Delphi Technique. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Delphi Technique. Show all posts

Friday, February 3, 2017

Life On State Salt Lake County and Regional Planners Social Engineering Our Community

Salt Lake County Residents

We need your assistance in attending this event!

Life On State

Print the Flyer and Inform Your Neighbor

Click the Photo to Visit the Site.

 

The Life on State project establishes a shared vision for the future of our valley's central, historic corridor. The vision was built on broad involvement from residents and stakeholders along State Street, claims Wasatch Front Regional Council, a Metro Planning Organization social engineering every community along the Wasatch Front.  An un-elected board of state and local elected leaders under the direction of Andrew Gruber.  To uncover the was these organizations work and co-opt the community to accept THEIR PLAN as our own the following information is very enlightening.


The Raw Deceit of Envision Utah-


John Anthony - Sustainable Freedom Lab

 

Planners call Envision Utah a ‘national model’ for regional planning. The Brookings Institute cited Utah as a “leader in [voluntary] regional planning…”


Behind the inflated congratulations lies sophisticated deceit and manipulation fast becoming the standard for regional planning.

Envision Utah began over 15 years ago as a public-private partnership offering recommendations to cities and counties to preserve open space, increase transportation choices and more.

Envision Utah claims to have one of regional planning’s most successful outreach programs. Nearly 2,000 people attended 50 workshops and 17,500 responded to online and mail-in surveys. Yet, the turnout is no wonder.

In one of the longest-running marketing campaigns in planning history, Envision Utah proponents assured residents that joining the plan was voluntary. There would be no un-elected regional councils, no regional plan, and the community would design the planning scenarios. This ‘no-risk’ campaign effectively disarmed community members’ objections, leaving planners free to advance their programs beneath a mantel of “neutrality”.

But, Envision Utah’s promissory jargon belies the unscrupulous tactics they used to win residents’ approval for the same mixed-use-open space algorithm that has been rejected in Utah and communities across the country.

Marketing to values-

Early in the planning process, the Envision Utah steering committee hired nationally recognized polling firm, Wirthland Worldwide, to determine the ‘quality of life’ values held by community members.

Survey results revealed that most respondents saw their state as a “safe haven, where others shared their common sense of honesty, morality and ethics.” They placed these values in the context of children and their families.

Envision Utah proponents then used these values as the centerpiece of a targeted marketing strategy designed to impose the planner’s ideas community by community.

Renaming controversial ideas-

Since the survey indicated family interaction was a high priority, planners re-branded their efforts. Urban planning became the glue that held families together. “High-density living”, was recast as compact housing that allowed young families to locate near relatives. Grandparents were urged to buy condos near their children rather than worry about new zoning laws that could restrict single family homes. Planners rarely discussed their role in creating the “restrictions.”

Planners replaced the unpopular term “Smart Growth”, with the more benign, “Quality Growth Strategy.” In keeping with their targeted marketing, Quality Growth meant keeping the air and water clean for children and grandchildren.

The “chip game”-

In 1998 Envision Utah developed a unique “chip game” which allowed community participants to place chips, representing homes, on a map to decide the future layout of their community. In deciding where to place homes, people had to consider complex issues such sewage lines, utilities and other services. It was billed as people talking charge of their future. Yet, even this community activity was highly controlled.

Early on planners established basic understandings. More open spaces were needed, long work drives damaged the environment and urban sprawl was to be avoided. This left the players few planning options. It was no surprise when most participants decided in favor of the same mixed-use, transit oriented living the planners wanted all along.

Promoting the vague-

Envision Utah avoided creating a visible plan that could be analyzed. Instead planners talked about principles, and suggested, rather than advocated, transit-oriented living, mixed-use and open spaces. They then ‘nudged’ community members to “do the right thing” by barraging them with internet ads, newspaper articles and workshops educating Utahans to the dangers of not having these urban designs.

In one example, Utah Transit Authority’s “King of the Road” commercial showed a man driving his convertible top-down, humming to the 60’s tune. Meanwhile, the crawl says, “He doesn’t know the words…Also doesn’t know that UTA takes 81,000 cars a year off the road.”

In 30 seconds, the ad depicts young, carefree people who love freedom as clueless, while reinforcing the dubious assumption that driving less is undeniably beneficial. At best, it is undeniably controversial.

Winning through fear-

Often scare tactics employed half-truths as in this example from Envision Utah’s website:

In urban areas, land close to existing job centers is rapidly disappearing, and if we’re not careful about how we grow, housing costs could skyrocket and force many of our good, hard-working neighbors elsewhere— excluding from our communities teachers, fire fighters, and our own children as they get their start in life. The further Utahans live from where they work, shop and play, the more they spend on car-related expenses.”

Notice the implied threat that if people do not live in a high density area, they could lose teachers, firefighters and even their own children (remember the values survey results) to rising costs. Little consideration was given to the exorbitant housing costs in other Smart Growth areas like, Seattle and Portland. The observation that car-costs rise if you move away from the urban center, overlooks the reality that, for many, this may be a worthwhile trade-off.

In spite of Envision Utah’s calculated posturing, there is little “neutral” about these statements.

The king of surveys-

Colorful, interactive online surveys still attract thousands and are promoted by Envision Utah and the state.

In this survey, targeting residents of Madison County, Utah, the planners explain that higher priced home costs are the result of larger lots and will require “individual families to sink wells and septic tanks.” Larger properties and self-contained services are positioned as burdens with no talk of the benefits.

Beneath the graph, planners note, “The more you spread out, the more expensive it is. This is not a judgment, just facts to think about. Road costs [are] paid by everybody.” The message is clear. Roads are costly, and if you want more, you are selfish since everyone else pays for them. There is no mention of the increased respiratory diseases, traffic congestion and exorbitant housing costs that accompany the high-density living planners are promoting.

As one seasoned planner observed, “Envision Utah uses the most biased surveys I have ever seen.”

Keys to success-

If Envision Utah has met success, it is mainly the result of distorted facts and a relentless, decade’s long marketing campaign creating the illusion that planners are neutral and participation is “voluntary.” One must wonder how many communities would volunteer if equal efforts were expended marketing the failures of compact living.

In spite of the deceptions, other regions, including Envision Missoula, Building the Wyoming We Want, Envision Central Texas, Louisiana Speaks, Superstition Vistas, Thrive 2055, and many more are adopting all or a portion of the Envision Utah model.

But plans that lure participants through deception can result in unwanted surprises.

Un-elected regional councils with the authority to mandate local zoning and regulations are the goal post of regional planning. Yet, Envision Utah created no new un-elected council. Urban designs are built upon pre-existing regional authorities like local Metropolitan Planning Organizations and the Utah Transit Authority. But once the smaller regional plans are completed, there is little to prevent a consortium of their leaders from formalizing a single larger region. Will this happen? It’s hard to say.

But history shows, all it takes is a little deceit and a good marketing campaign.

 

Learn more about planning and Sustainable Development

 

 

Learn The Lingo, Vernacular, Buzz Words, Jargon here


Links:

https://www.lifeonstate.com/

http://www.freedomadvocates.org/whats-behind-qthe-visionq-in-your-town/

http://www.wfrc.org/publications/Life_On_State/Life_on_State_Final_Document.pdf

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5833888c1b631b0eb8a3b848/t/588149d39f7456d533068521/1484868052504/LOS_Feb+Workshop+Flyer_FINAL.pdf

http://wfrc.org/new_wfrc/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-gruber-88823324

http://sustainablefreedomlab.org/

http://www.envisionutah.org/images/reports-resources/Wirthlin_Worldwide_Values_Research_Summary.pdf

https://www.lifeonstate.com/get-involved?platform=hootsuite

http://www.envisionutah.org/community-engagement/item/168

https://youtu.be/HOGuPynMOs4

http://www.envisionutah.org/component/k2/item/139-housing-cost-of-living

http://www.envisionutah.org/images/reports-resources/Utah_Value_To_Growth_Harris.pdf

http://envisionutah.net/scenarios/seagull/transportation-and-communities

http://www.thespectrum.com/story/issuesofourtimes/2015/10/26/does-envision-utahs-plan-have-a-firm-foundation/74633616/

https://i4.rideuta.com/mc/?page=DoingBusiness-TransitOrientedDevelopment

https://youtu.be/Rm-XusgA_CA

http://agenda21truth.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2012-01-01T00:00:00-07:00&updated-max=2013-01-01T00:00:00-07:00&max-results=1

 


Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Utah City Tries to Silence Opposition to UTOPIA By Dangling $20 Carrot

  West Valley City Tries To Drum Up Community Support On Twitter the Morning Of June 11, 2014

@WVCUT twitter feed shows how it is trying to silence the public in association with their "deal with the devel" UTOPIA/Ooma.

After taking a few minutes in the morning, as I want to do, to check out what's going on on twitter, on June 11, I saw the following tweets from West Valley City and the following events happened.

 I paged down to see this tweet by a local news reporter.

The following response to the reporters tweet is shown here.

I know this sounds backward, but I paged up to see the most recent posts and shortly after this they tweeted this and the reporter re-tweeted it, therefore the following response, which again, included the website www.protectingtaxpayers.org.

...tweet showing an additional response.

...Then a "quoted" tweet with a web-link, again directing viewers to check out the facts, also rapidly deleted from their timeline.

@WVCUT twitter feed showing the re-tweet that was later deleted from their feed.

@WVCUT tweet timeline showing "learn about their partnership with Ooma/UTOPIA" Public Utility.  Their tweets were deleted soon after they received responses as to quash public opposition.

This screen grab show the rebuttal tweets to @WVCUT UTOPIA tweets, not visible now on their twitter time line because they deleted their original tweets.

This last screen shot shows the timeline from Tuesday June 10 to Wednesday morning June 11 when they made their announcement via news media and their WVC Live Feed.  The post at 17 hrs. was re-tweeted by the same account that posted rebuttals encouraging residents to "get their ears up!"  Unaware of what they were planning!

 

 Now That West Valley City Has Been "Outed" For Deleting Replies To Their Twitter Feed, Let's Find Out WHY?

 

First of all, this all started in the late 90's early 2000 with then city manager John Patterson proposed Resolution No. 02.41 Interlocal Agreement to Form Utah Telecommunication Open Infrastructure Agency (UTOPIA) the city counsel used 2000 census numbers to estimate costs in order to fund the effort and move forward.  Thanks to the US Congress Telecommunications Act of 1996 CITIES could also establish themselves as cable, phone and internet providers.  In West Valley City's case, they are partnering with a short list of current cable/internet providers and locking out the supposed competition the act of congress champions this action.  Although city officials don't want to here the "government should not impede free market competition" argument, the conservative view is that it DOES work!

 

 

 

Utah Cities Sign On Despite Endeavor Being Plagued With Problems

Although West Valley City, and others, (16 to be exact, not the 11 others perport), have been funding the "problem plagued" venture with tax payer dollars and bond initiatives for years, the "black whole" UTOPIA has city officials "hook line and sinker!"  Instead of cutting the line and letting taxpayers off the hook they bait the hook with claims of "FREE Phone Service" and other lies like, "UTOPIA/Ooma will save residents $20Mil.  The facts are everywhere if you have an interest to find them. 

Taxpayers Protection Alliance "Utah's UTOPIA Broadband, No Utopia For Taxpayers"   

R Street "Utah Residents May Be Charged $20 A Month To Bail Out UTOPIA" 

Heartlander "Utah Cities In Big Debt From Muni Telecom Network" 

American Consumer Institute "The Costly Truth of Municipal Broadband Networks"

Americans For Prosperity "Utah Confirms Municipal Broadband Is No UTOPIA" And In their Publication Need To Know it notes the following..."UTOPIA has not once turned a profit and currently owes over $81 million in debt." (Click on the highlighted text "have experienced widespread failure" for the PDF in which the quotes is noted).

Daily Harold "UTOPIA Is Failing Orem Residents"

Coalition For The New Economy "UTOPIA, A Failing Government-Owned Network In Utah"

 

 

 

Although "The Government" Has Given The Green Light They Won't Stop Until They've Implemented It, Come Hell Or High Water!

You know how government works...or doesn't as the case may be?  They've come up with a plan and they are going to "force" it upon the citizenry!  My only explanation to implementing a failed program is, there's money involved.  Experts say, "follow the money."  And from the source links above, THERE AIN'T NONE!  So why the heavy handed approach to "leading the horse to water?"  Maybe it's to "save face."  No one wants to admit failure!  Despite YEARS of failure after failure, dollar after dollar WASTED, proof mounting from multiple sources, examples of failed plans from other cities and states (Keyword "Utah"), why can't city officials CUT THIS THING LOOSE?  Although John Patterson of West Valley City painted the "UTOPIA Picture", Wayne Pyle has picked up the proverbial torch and started RUNNING with it!  He could have been the "sane one" in the room like Rocky Anderson, and I rarely have a compliment for Rocky, but Mr. Pyle could have said, "we need to put a stop this madness now!"  Although Salt Lake City did not buy a ticket on the UTOPIA Train they are still in many ways using the network.  Maybe it's that Wayne Pyle (page 3), like other UTOPIA City Officials, are on the board of directors for this crony capitalist, government sanctioned debacle.  Even George Washington Law Review (again keyword "Utah"), says, "all they need to do is put it in a pretty box and tie it with a bow and we'll take it!"  Although they also make note of the fact that state law requires a "review study" and that municipalities just need to show the citizens how it will generate a profit...as noted before in the links, this is already dis proven. Maybe the money is in the Stock & Bond Market?  The Utah Legislature has done it's own study and it too is seriously considering scraping the government sanctioned program.  With only a 16% average participation rate, it needs 30% to break even, it doesn't muster enough support for it to continue.  Thankfully all government programs are not for all people, like the Affordable Care Act, this is a black hole!

 

 

 

We Need Boots On The Ground, Citizenry Armed With The Facts!

As you heard in the Utah Legislature Audit Audio from the link above, they have a battle plan, we must have one too!  City Leaders like Wayne Pyle (West Valley) and Paul Cutler (Centerville) continue to mislead the public on the UTOPIA venture.  If these city officials are on the board I think there is a conflict of interest as they also serve in their cities, but since it's a government sanctioned entity we have to put up with that, but the citizens of these towns and cities should know the truth, like that expressed by Hans Anderson (Orem) and the Utah Taxpayers Association, "if it's in the yellow pages, government should not be doing it."  So, why the "hard sell" by cities like Orem and West Valley?  It must be the board salaries provided in part by the stimulus, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which provided approximately $60Mil in 2013, and maybe some of those bond funds provided by your tax dollars.  We need to get our hands on these financial statements of these board officials and see the "motivation" with our own eyes!  As Tom Marriott was approached by Pyle to resign as director of UTOPIA due to friction with UTOPIA City Officals, Pyle seems confident he can persuade WVC residents to swallow the poisoned pill.  As evidence in West Valley City Council Meetings held recently, where Mathew Laker resident in District 4 points out as he addressed the council on June 10, 2014, "more vetting by the council and citizenry are in deed in order."  After which Mr. Pyle pushed forward, without the written plan suggested by the legislative auditor in the 2012 audit requiring such, shooting from the hip with the mayor chiming in with ideas of what to do and what the City Led Meetings would look like, they cobbled together proposed Community Outreach Events labeled "Open House" in which the community would be invited in the months of July, August and September, to interact with Wayne Pyle and Council Members as advocates for the proposal.  It was voiced by the Mayor and endorsed by Pyle, that the Taxpayers Association would NOT be invited, and that no opposition to leaving the endeavor to the "free market" would be entertained.  They both denied the fact that participating cities would turn off your water for non-payment of your broadband utility fee documented here.  There is a playbook for this type of community outreach, it's used by the Agenda 21/Sustainable Development NGO Operatives, it's called the Delphi Method.  It's the "divide and conquer" method and ruling the "bully pulpit" psychological warfare.

 

 

 

Let's Muster Up and Fight This Battle Together!

Now, I don't know if you noticed in the WVC Council Meeting video but, there weren't a lot of citizens in attendance.  Let's help people like Mathew Laker by doing our own community outreach and information campaign, or start a petition or participate in gathering signatures for this one.  Those "Open House/Public Outreach" events the city is planning, let's have a citizen coalition present to combat the lies that are being perpetrated and propagated by our government officials.  If they won't let you in the facility, set up outside where the public enters the event, on the public sidewalk if needed.  Those meetings are for the community and we should not let government run roughshod over the citizens.  Let's invite the Taxpayer Advocate Groups with a knowledge of the UTOPIA issue to attend to level the playing battle field with facts!  Let's set up information centers outside business establishments to educate our fellow citizens on the issue, have a petition there for them to sign.  (I run into these setups practically every time I go to California, and I, as an out-of-stator, are always welcome to participate in the national referendums they are drumming up support for).  Make banners.  Display signs, Fliers, Door Hangers.  Use Social Media and network with fellow citizens to orchestrate your opposition. Contact your city officials and attend City Council Meetings and the like.  These are your tax dollars folks.  Being mandated by a Municipal Utility Fee, which you have to pay weather your using the services or not, and if you're like my elderly mother on a fixed income who doesn't even know how to use the internet, she will have to pay!  This is YOUR government, "of the people, by the people, for the people", and we should not let their consensus driven agenda be force fed to us!  Let's move!  Hooah!

 

There is some disputation of exactly how many cities are part of the UTOPIA debacle.  I found a map with 15 cities and wiki lists 16 cities.  Find your city and contact your city officials before they advance the red line, or point of no return!

UTOPIA has two types of members: pledging and non-pledging. Pledging cities have committed to cover bond payments should UTOPIA become unable to service the debt through subscriber revenues. Non-pledging cities have made no such commitment and will only see construction begin after the pledging cities are complete and if UTOPIA goes revenue positive.
Watch WVC Wayne Pyle as he makes the announcement, as if this is a new venture, for FREE phone service including the "box" that was purchased by the city with your tax dollars YEARS before this venture partnership with Ooma was ever conceived, among other lies...this is exhausting!

No matter how you spin it, fiber optic and the like are not necessary to run a city, they are not infrastructure!  Former UTOPIA Executive Director full interview.


It is important to understand that I am not against fiber-optic providers like UTOPIA, I am against making it a government sponsored utility.  I am for an open, free market, but don't agree with corporations teaming up with government to provide a service that should be driven by consumer demand and uses government to fund their operation by overcharging and requiring hardware be installed against property owners wishes having to, in the end, pay for a service they may not choose to use, creating a "cash cow".